1. Welcome to Cameraderie.org—a friendly camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Video: Kodak 3200 vs Ilford 3200

Discussion in 'Film Cameras' started by phigmov, Apr 12, 2018.

  1. phigmov

    phigmov Veteran

    277
    Mar 23, 2015
    Quite enjoyed this - two high-speed B&W films compared.

    I've never had much luck with high-speed film but I'm tempted to give it another crack in the right circumstances. It looks like the Kodak is definitely grittier and the Ilford has a smoother look to it. The presenter did well in some of those handheld slow-shutter speed shots particularly when the meter only went up to 1600 and some compensation would have had to have been dialled in.

     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Cerita

    Cerita Veteran Subscribing Member

    338
    Jul 24, 2017
    Canada
    Very interesting video, thank you for sharing it, and I have subscribed. For me it's nice to see a female film photographer in Canada :) . I watched the video twice and I think I prefer the Tmax 3200, it's seems to much more punchier with great contrast and range the the Ilford 3200.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. I've never used a film faster than ASA 400, but if I had to choose between these two, I'd take the Tmax. The Ilford just looks a little bland to me.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. phigmov

    phigmov Veteran

    277
    Mar 23, 2015
    Yes, it looks like it picks up the high-lights & shadow detail better (maybe more dynamic range?) - I almost wonder if it wouldn't be better for low-light shots of people / portraits ? Otherwise the gritty feel of the T-Max seems to better suit contrasty/punchy low-light situations where subtlety isn't a requirement.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.