-
Cameraderie, a friendly photography forum, join now for free!
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI USA
- Name
- Luke
The X-Pro body looks small there. I remember loving it because my hand never felt cramped. Either that lens is pretty big or my memory is wrong.
D
Deleted member 13442
Guest
" Some insensitive person on the web made this mock up of the forthcoming 16-80 mounted on a X-Pro2. What a dirty tease!!"
Its probably a loan officer at a bank.
Its probably a loan officer at a bank.
Last edited by a moderator:
Lightmancer
Legend
- Location
- Sunny Frimley
- Name
- Bill Palmer
I agree. It looks out of proportion for an f4. Logically I'm expecting it to be the same size as, or slightly smaller than, the 18-55.
Lightmancer
Legend
- Location
- Sunny Frimley
- Name
- Bill Palmer
blimey...
Dave Jenkins
Regular
- Name
- Dave Jenkins
I sold my 18-135 because it was just too big/heavy for my taste as an everyday walkaround lens on my Fuji bodies.
Lightmancer
Legend
- Location
- Sunny Frimley
- Name
- Bill Palmer
That's my concern. I have the 18-135, and a very handy lens it is too, for travel, but it is the weight of two to three of my other lenses so it becomes a choice of what to leave behind...
Dave Jenkins
Regular
- Name
- Dave Jenkins
This is off-topic, Bill Palmer, but I hope you have another book in the works. I really liked the first one.
Lightmancer
Legend
- Location
- Sunny Frimley
- Name
- Bill Palmer
Thank you very much Dave, I have... It involves Vladimir Putin, Prince Charles, a stolen blood sample, a kidnapping...
But I'm telling you the plot
I intended to have it finished back in May, but I have been stupid busy on my "day job(s)". Still, I wrote a good chunk of it whilst on holiday, so it is coming...
Off topic is what we’re known for
D
Deleted member 13442
Guest
Yeah, it makes me wonder why we have topics.
- Location
- Boston Burbs
- Name
- David
I would think same or smaller than the 18-55 is wishful thinking.
They give meaning to “off topic”.
