Question for M Film Camera Owners

Discussion in 'Leica' started by Biro, Aug 8, 2017.

  1. Biro

    Biro Super Moderator

    Aug 7, 2011
    Jersey Shore
    Steve
    For those who own Leica film cameras, how do you process your images? Do you still have darkrooms? Do you send out your film to be professionally developed into negatives? And, once that's done, do you have them printed professionally? Do you do your own printing? Do you scan your negatives and then switch to a digital work flow?

    I'm asking because, as I search for a Leica film camera of my own, I'm trying to work out some of these questions for myself. I'll probably be shooting mostly black and white. I used to have a darkroom in the 70s and 80s. But I suspect that won't be practical for me these days. I'd like to know how others are managing their work flow.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. BrianS

    BrianS Super Moderator

    Apr 3, 2013
    "When i have more free time"- I will start doing B&W again, process the negatives and scan them. I have the enlarger and support equipment, but the develop and scan allows this to be done in a half-bathroom.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. asiafish

    asiafish All-Pro

    Aug 9, 2013
    Bakersfield, CA
    Andrew
    I drop mine at a local lab for developing and high-quality scanning.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. cobbu2

    cobbu2 Regular

    48
    Sep 17, 2014
    Rockville, MD
    Almost always I'm using black and white film; I process it myself then scan to jpeg files with some adjustment in PS Elements. I have a darkroom and print only the images I want to display at home or on request by others.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. chris0202

    chris0202 Regular

    38
    Aug 13, 2017
    I also mainly use B&W film and process myself. TMAX in HC-110 takes 5-6 minutes developing and 5 min fixing. Not really too time consuming. Slides go to AgX.

    Scanning wise, I use my digital camera and macro lens. This involves more manual labor and getting-used-to but "scans" faster and yields better results (as you can do stacking without losing resolution).
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. M. Valdemar

    M. Valdemar Veteran

    230
    Aug 5, 2013
    New York City
    I still use Clark photo for C41. Cheap, takes a week to ten days, you get back prints and negatives.

    Very good quality.

    ClarkColor -
     
    • Like Like x 3
  7. JonVdG

    JonVdG Regular

    34
    Apr 29, 2016
    Boulder, Colorado
    Jon
    I have mine developed at a pro lab who also does high resolution scanning, and then I print them myself from the digital files in my studio. Gone are the days when I had enough space for and time for my own darkroom. Today, many of the higher quality labs do a really nice job of developing and scanning, so I leave that to them because most of my work is digital and I just can't justify an analog lab. I used to let them print both my film and digital work, but I found that they could never quite match the print quality I get when I do it myself. My printer takes up a bit of space in my studio and requires some maintenance, but I'll never again let someone else print my work. I've worked with some of the best and they do good work, but printing is just too personal.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  8. Horn38

    Horn38 New Member

    3
    Feb 14, 2016
    For B&W, I do myself, for color I use a lab!
     
  9. Brian McGloin

    Brian McGloin New Member

    2
    Aug 21, 2015
    Brian McGloin
    I've been shooting wonderfully cheap Lomography 100 and 400 print film in a Leica M4-2 with a 35 f2 Summicron.
    The film looks a lot like Fuji Xtra and is inexpensive. I don't think I would use it for paying or "serious" work ... or maybe, it's really not bad.
    I use a local lab, Blue Moon Camera, here in Portland to develop and scan the film. While not the least expensive, it is local and their quality is phenomenal.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  10. Hello Biro,
    Glad to see so many good approaches.
    For film exposed with my M4 I like to process it myself. Since the demise of Fuji Neopan 400 I have been using mostly Tri-X. It works nicely with HC110. I have used a Nikon scanner in the past and been very happy with the results. I have tried an Epson V750 also. Currently I'm giving a Leitz Beoon with an el nikkor a real workout. I think it may turn out to be the best way for me.
    Keep Eager.
    JH
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Archiver

    Archiver Top Veteran

    716
    Jul 11, 2010
    Melbourne, Australia
    I shoot colour negative film, which is taken to the local photolab where they dev, scan and print. They send me the scans by Dropbox, and I can pick up the prints at my leisure. This does limit the subject matter of my film photography a bit.

    I've got a pile of black and white rolls in the fridge that I shot some years ago, thinking that I'd learn to develop film and scan it myself. This has yet to happen.

    I've seen a lot of people develop their black and white film and then scan it in various ways, either with an Epson flatbed, Plustek tray scanner, old Nikon scanner, or use a DSLR, macro lens and copy stand. The results I've seen from using a DSLR and macro lens to scan negatives is really quite amazing, although the processing seems to take some effort and skill.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. MoonMind

    MoonMind All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Dec 29, 2013
    Switzerland
    Matt
    I have my negatives developed at a professional lab - but they get send off to there, and it does take weeks. I'll start developing my own b&w films soon (I'm a LabBox backer), but only time will tell if I have enough time to do all of it. Colour will probably get rarer from there on ... I scan my negatives myself and have just bought a Braun FS 120 to take over the bulk of that load; it'll be some time until I have cleared the backlog, though. I'm not sure if I still need the CanoScan 9000F Mk II I've been using until now, but if not, all the better. So, my workflow is part analog, part digital; enlargements are done by the same professional lab (from the negatives, of course).

    ^ That - and time! It's a one-by-one process that requires you to adjust the setup for every single negative/slide. Possible results are fantastic (especially with the D810 and D850 and Nikon's dedicated accessory), but you have to factor in the effort.

    My only other worry is that M4-P does eat a lot of HP5+ - it's much more voracious than the M6 ... I think I'll have to put it on a bit of a diet. The M10 should help with that ...

    M.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.