new Lytro with 30-250mm f2.0 lens

Discussion in 'Open Gear Talk' started by krugorg, Apr 22, 2014.

  1. krugorg

    krugorg All-Pro

    Sep 26, 2011
    Minnesota USA
    Kyle Krug
    I just saw this new announcement on Wired. 40 Megarays*!


    *sounds so much cooler than megapixels
  2. Luke

    Luke Super Moderator Subscribing Member

    Nov 11, 2011
    Milwaukee, WI USA
    I think they are getting a better idea about what this camera is FOR. It's not good at being a traditional stills camera. But for a new type of interactive photograph, it is perfect. It's a very niche product, but a very cool one.
  3. rybolt

    rybolt Itinerant picture taker

    Mar 24, 2014
    Yellow Springs, Ohio USA
    Paul Rybolt
    They've invented the focus pull. It's just that they do in in Post rather than in camera.
  4. Boid

    Boid All-Pro

    Dec 15, 2011
    Bangalore, India
    I think the ability to have infinity focus at f2.0 is rather remarkable. That's a game changer right there.
  5. but, apparently still only at 2.5Megapixel image resolution.

    I'd much rather have a camera with "traditional focussing" with ADDED Lytro functionality -> but only for small focus corrections in a limited depth, e.g. when the camera focussed on someone's glasses instead of their eyes...

    By limiting the "refocussing depth", we'd get higher image resolution. Which would make this camera much more useful (at least in my eyes :) )
  6. Boid

    Boid All-Pro

    Dec 15, 2011
    Bangalore, India
    DPReview says it's about 5mp, which should give a flattened jpg image size of 2240X2240 (at 1:1) or 2736X1824 (at 3:2)
  7. Looks like Lytro isn't giving out any "official" numbers and every website does their own math :)

    Thom Hogan admits he is confused, but his numbers are "either 1.25 or 2.5MP"...

    Ah well, wait and see... either way, at a price of 1600$ I'm not getting too interested in this one (yet)
    • Like Like x 1
  8. speedandstyle

    speedandstyle Regular

    Mar 10, 2013
    I think it is neat and at least this one is a functional camera instead of a square tube thing. I could put it to use for some of the video slide shows I have to make for work{I work in a children's ministry}. I have done the Ken Burns effect which is better than just still, but this gives a new dimension to images. The price is too high but if after a year or two the price comes down I might get one.