I love my fuji XE1 and indeed the ooc jpgs are superb, but as you say it's a special camera and not for everybody and it does lack some things , hence why i prefer the omd as a second body (faster single af, more lens options, telezoom, macro, ...)
Fuji should *really* consider offering Peaking via firmware update for the current gen bodies (X Pro X-E). They'd be stupid not to...
Not to be a contrarian, but having tried peaking on NEX, it's really just not the same as using a big optical viewfinder for manual focus. I suppose it's a good compromise since a lot of these cameras don't have optical viewfinders. I've never even bothered getting adapters for the Fuji cameras. The lenses are as good as the Nikon ones I have so there really isn't a point. The Fuji 60mm is the only macro I've used that is as good as the Lester Dine. I suppose I'm a bit curious about the split image focus patch on the new X100 but I'm not buying it because of that. I doubt I would ever use manual focus with it. Focus by wire is just terrible.
FWIW I spend a good deal of time on TalkNEX and it seems to me that there are a good deal more folks joining that forum than leaving at the moment. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems that daily I am seeing new folks introduce themselves.
People will always be switching systems I suppose and in no way to i want ppl to dislike NEX, because they are great little cameras
Absolutely. I love switching. It's just so much fun to try something different. That being said, and being Nexless as of today, I would totally consider having NEX again in the future if the lens line-up grows a bit in a useful direction, and if AF performance gets truly boosted. NEX rock, no doubt.
I think this also! M4/3 and Fuji render their images in a much more analogue way...to me anyway!Also I feel that nex renders images a bit too.. hmmm "digital"