Jock Elliott
Hall of Famer
- Location
- Troy, NY
I was fooling around with the LX100, experimenting with different aspect ratios.
I took this at 3:2, taking care to put the candlestick at the lower left corner of the frame:
The I took this at 16:9:
The data says both were taken at 24mm (e) or 11mm actual, but one is clearly wider than the other.
How can this be? Or what am I doing wrong in thinking about this?
Additional: I tried the same trick with the FZ200:
This is 3:2:
This is 16:9:
Clearly, the difference is in the height, not the width, of the frame.
Cheers, Jock
I took this at 3:2, taking care to put the candlestick at the lower left corner of the frame:
The I took this at 16:9:
The data says both were taken at 24mm (e) or 11mm actual, but one is clearly wider than the other.
How can this be? Or what am I doing wrong in thinking about this?
Additional: I tried the same trick with the FZ200:
This is 3:2:
This is 16:9:
Clearly, the difference is in the height, not the width, of the frame.
Cheers, Jock
Last edited: