Minniesmum
Regular
Not sure if this is on the " correct " forum as it's an opinion...
Over the course of the past 10 years or so I've enjoyed using my older lenses on digital- started with Tamron Adaptall on the KM 5D DSLR and continuing with many more on the Olympus micro-four thirds bodies.
For me the sharpness of an image depends very much on one's eye and accuracy of focus. The VF2 and up to x14 magnification on the E-P3 helps enormously.
So when I see posts/reviews of various often hideously expensive glass- mostly Leica - and peeps saying this lens is sharper than that lens, etc. ,
I wonder how much of that perceived achievable sharpness is down to one's eye and focusing skills ?
Just wondering how other folk perceive sharpness and aside from technical measurements, does it really just depend on human judgement ??
btw I don't go sharpness hunting- more interested in bokeh and quirkiness
Over the course of the past 10 years or so I've enjoyed using my older lenses on digital- started with Tamron Adaptall on the KM 5D DSLR and continuing with many more on the Olympus micro-four thirds bodies.
For me the sharpness of an image depends very much on one's eye and accuracy of focus. The VF2 and up to x14 magnification on the E-P3 helps enormously.
So when I see posts/reviews of various often hideously expensive glass- mostly Leica - and peeps saying this lens is sharper than that lens, etc. ,
I wonder how much of that perceived achievable sharpness is down to one's eye and focusing skills ?
Just wondering how other folk perceive sharpness and aside from technical measurements, does it really just depend on human judgement ??
btw I don't go sharpness hunting- more interested in bokeh and quirkiness