I just got got myself the EPL5 (my first interchangeable lens camera) and I'm having a hard time decided what prime lens to buy. I've been researching the m43 primes and narrowed it down to the pany 14mm and 20mm.
Basically my previous camera was a canon s95 (28mm equiv).. so I got used to having a wide angle at my disposal.
Seems like general opinion is mostly in favour of the 20mm for it's sharpness and speed, however, I came across a post stating that the 20mm is not that great at focusing in low light, resulting in better low light performance with the 14mm. (Panasonic 20mm and 14mm in low light - Micro Four Thirds User Forum)
It's also seems to be debated whether there's much of a jump in quality/performance between the 14mm and oly kit lens. After every research session, the decision get tougher and tougher!
Considering i'm new to lens cameras, don't have a particularly steady hand and get quite pissed off when I can't get a decent photo in low light.. which one would be the best compromise as an all-round vacation/walkabout/indoor lens?
Basically my previous camera was a canon s95 (28mm equiv).. so I got used to having a wide angle at my disposal.
Seems like general opinion is mostly in favour of the 20mm for it's sharpness and speed, however, I came across a post stating that the 20mm is not that great at focusing in low light, resulting in better low light performance with the 14mm. (Panasonic 20mm and 14mm in low light - Micro Four Thirds User Forum)
It's also seems to be debated whether there's much of a jump in quality/performance between the 14mm and oly kit lens. After every research session, the decision get tougher and tougher!
Considering i'm new to lens cameras, don't have a particularly steady hand and get quite pissed off when I can't get a decent photo in low light.. which one would be the best compromise as an all-round vacation/walkabout/indoor lens?