I hope this is not a repost.
Andreas Gursky's Rhine River Photo Fetches $US4.3 Million
Please enjoy and discuss
Andreas Gursky's Rhine River Photo Fetches $US4.3 Million
Please enjoy and discuss
thanks for comment.
I would say I am quite neutral when it comes to 'what is worth what'. as I fully understand the concept that 'if someone is willing to pay for a product for $X, the product is worth $X'. this goes to every single product in our market-driven economy.
It is true that a small sample on a computer screen will not make justice. AFAIK, this picture is 6 foot by 12 foot.
thanks for comment.
I would say I am quite neutral when it comes to 'what is worth what'. as I fully understand the concept that 'if someone is willing to pay for a product for $X, the product is worth $X'. this goes to every single product in our market-driven economy.
It is true that a small sample on a computer screen will not make justice. AFAIK, this picture is 6 foot by 12 foot.
I agree, much of what passes for art I just don't get.
If someone copied this picture and posted without the name attached, very few people would notice it.
if it wasn't for the massive size of the photo I doubt the work would ever make it to auction..
That' what I'm saying. If it wasn't for the size no one would be interest in such a boring image. I find your comparision to a Picasso funny because now that photography has entered the art world there are those that expect it to act like it.
Paul, you mean like Chuck Close?
Chuck Close - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia