Well, I rather liked it. I agree with Luke that it was meant to be an ironic post. My take is that it is also a screed about how flippin' earnest and serious people get about their photography (and I specifically exclude the folks who hang out here).
For most of us, it's a pasttime, a hobby, something we do for enjoyment . . . so lighten up a little . . . and if you discover something that seems true and valuable to you, by all means share it . . . but don't require that everyone else adopt it as gospel or castigate those who disagree.
The flip side of that, of course, is that enthusiasm is infectious. If someone manages to do something weird, or unusual, or funky, it's neat to see or read about their "joy in the journey."
And if you are a professional, you darn well better know what you are doing so you can deliver the results that will please the person who signs the checks. Many years ago, in a galaxy, far, far away, I worked at GE's Research and Development Center. They had a photography department who we in the Public Information Office, would use to illustrate the news releases we were issuing about new discoveries and developments. Most of the photographers were very, very good. One would have occasional flashes of real brilliance but would also sometimes deliver results that were unusable for our purposes. I would always request one of the other photographers, because I always wanted a usable result.
Anyway, thanks for posting that. It was an interesting read and food for thought.
Cheers, Jock